In the world of landscape photography, image sharpness from foreground to background is often considered the holy grail. One approach that has long been used to achieve this is stopping down the aperture to f/22. However, with advancements in post-processing and more photographers embracing hybrid techniques, focus stacking has become a compelling alternative. A recent conversation I had about tilt-shift lenses reminded me of focus stacking, a method I had previously overlooked. That conversation led me to conduct an informal comparison between two popular sharpness strategies—using a narrow aperture like f/22 versus blending multiple focused images through stacking.
What Exactly is Focus Stacking?
Focus stacking is a technique where multiple images are captured at different focal distances and later combined using post-processing software. The goal is to achieve complete focus throughout the scene, from the closest foreground elements to the most distant background features. This method is already widely adopted in macro photography where extreme shallow depth of field makes it almost impossible to get the entire subject in focus in a single shot. But its advantages translate beautifully to landscape scenes, where sweeping views often contain subjects both mere inches from the lens and stretching to the far horizon.
Imagine using an f/2.8 aperture to gain the fastest shutter speed and optimal lens performance, yet still achieving sharpness across the frame. That’s the power of focus stacking. Instead of sacrificing clarity due to diffraction at narrow apertures like f/22, you combine the best of both worlds: wide aperture benefits and full-scene sharpness.
Understanding the Popularity of f/22 in Landscape Photography
Landscape photography is a genre that thrives on clarity, structure, and the preservation of fine detail across wide spatial planes. For generations, landscape shooters have relied on using smaller apertures like f/16 and f/22 to maximize depth of field. The thinking is straightforward—by narrowing the aperture, more of the scene from foreground to infinity will appear in acceptable focus.
This reliance on f/22 became a standard practice in traditional photography because of its ability to capture scenes in a single exposure where the entire landscape—rocks in the foreground, trees in the midground, and distant mountains—remains sharp. Especially when shooting with wide-angle lenses, stopping down the aperture seems like a logical step to increase the zone of sharpness.
But while this method works in theory and is still widely practiced, it introduces a trade-off that many beginner and even intermediate photographers fail to account for: the issue of diffraction.
The Impact of Diffraction on Image Sharpness
Diffraction is a fundamental optical phenomenon that limits how sharp an image can be at very small apertures. When a lens is stopped down beyond its optimal aperture—typically f/8 to f/11 for most high-quality lenses—the bending of light waves around the edges of the aperture blades causes a reduction in sharpness. This reduction is not due to camera shake, lens quality, or missed focus; it’s a physical limitation of light.
As a result, details in grass, leaves, rocks, or distant textures start to lose their crispness. The image might still look sharp when scaled down for web use or social media, but issues arise when the file is enlarged, cropped, or prepared for high-resolution printing. The micro-contrast diminishes, and what once seemed tack-sharp now appears slightly muddy or smoothed out.
This degradation is especially pronounced on high-megapixel sensors, where every pixel’s ability to resolve fine detail matters. Ironically, the very approach that was meant to improve depth of field ends up compromising the overall clarity of the photo.
The Role of Sensor Resolution in Revealing Diffraction
In the era of film, diffraction was less noticeable due to the limitations of chemical emulsions. However, with the advent of high-resolution digital sensors—ranging from 24MP to 60MP and beyond—diffraction has become much more visible. These sensors are extremely sensitive to even slight softening, especially when viewed at full resolution or when cropping in during post-production.
On cameras with smaller sensors like Micro Four Thirds or APS-C, diffraction may begin to appear even earlier, around f/8 to f/11. Full-frame systems tolerate slightly smaller apertures before noticeable degradation, but by f/22, almost every camera-lens combination begins to suffer visibly.
This makes understanding the behavior of your specific sensor and lens combination essential. Using the wrong aperture, especially on high-end gear, can limit the performance you're paying a premium for.
Limitations of Using f/22 in Real-World Scenarios
Photographers often choose f/22 when they feel they must have maximum depth of field in a single shot—perhaps to freeze a moment in time during dramatic lighting or to ensure everything is in focus without resorting to multiple exposures. However, this can backfire when the resulting image lacks the punch and clarity that modern viewers or clients expect.
In addition, shooting at f/22 often requires slower shutter speeds or higher ISO settings, especially in lower light. This introduces the risk of motion blur or increased noise. Even with a tripod, long exposure times can make scenes vulnerable to subject movement—like swaying grass or drifting clouds—which adds another layer of difficulty.
Another problem is lens flare. At f/22, more lens elements are exposed to incoming light, increasing the chance of flaring or ghosting, particularly when shooting towards the sun. This can lead to loss of contrast and distracting artifacts in the image.
Alternatives to f/22 for Maximum Depth and Sharpness
The growing popularity of focus stacking offers an elegant and high-quality solution to the diffraction problem. Rather than using a single exposure at a tiny aperture, photographers can capture multiple frames at wider, sharper apertures such as f/8 or f/11. Each frame focuses on a different part of the scene—from foreground to background—and they are blended together in post-processing to create one seamless image.
This method preserves the sharpness and optical performance of the lens while still achieving full-scene focus. Additionally, using wider apertures means faster shutter speeds and lower ISOs, which helps in reducing camera shake and image noise.
Focus stacking does require a stable tripod, patience, and a solid post-processing workflow, but for critical work—especially gallery prints or client projects—it’s a worthwhile investment of time.
Other workarounds include using tilt-shift lenses, which physically adjust the plane of focus to cover more of the scene without needing a narrow aperture. These are highly specialized tools, but in the hands of an experienced user, they deliver exceptional results.
Situations Where f/22 Still Makes Sense
Despite its limitations, there are moments when shooting at f/22 is still valid. When capturing fast-changing light—such as during sunrise or sunset—there may not be enough time to shoot and stack multiple images. In such scenarios, using a single exposure ensures you don't miss the critical moment.
Photographers working in challenging environments like windy summits, coastal cliffs, or unstable terrain might also choose to simplify their workflow. Using f/22 can be the practical choice when dealing with movement, unpredictable light, or when carrying minimal gear.
Moreover, for photographers creating purely artistic, impressionistic images, the slight softening caused by diffraction might be a creative choice rather than a flaw.
Real-World Comparison: f/22 Versus Focus Stacking for Landscape Sharpness
In the pursuit of ultimate image clarity in landscape photography, one of the most important decisions a photographer faces is how to achieve full-scene sharpness. Traditionally, stopping down the aperture to f/22 has been the go-to method. However, with more advanced post-processing techniques available, focus stacking has emerged as a high-quality alternative. To assess the practical difference between these two approaches, I conducted a field test by capturing the same landscape scene using both techniques.
The first shot was a single exposure at f/22. The second was a composite built from four exposures taken at f/2.8, each focused on a different plane in the scene: foreground rocks, mid-ground shrubs, and distant trees. All images were captured on a tripod to ensure perfect alignment and consistency in lighting and exposure.
Initial Impressions and Visual Results
At a glance, both versions of the image seemed similar. The f/22 shot achieved a uniform level of focus throughout the scene, while the focus-stacked image initially appeared no more detailed. But this perception shifted quickly when the images were examined at full resolution on a large screen. When viewed at 100% magnification, the focus-stacked composition showed noticeably more refined textures, enhanced contrast along edges, and a sense of dimension in details like grass blades, tree bark, and rock fissures.
Even with a minor oversight—failing to capture a fifth frame focused on the top-right trees—the stacked image retained more integrity in terms of clarity. This kind of visual sharpness is rarely achievable in a single exposure, especially at extreme aperture settings.
Technical Advantages of the Stacked Image
The core reason for this improved performance lies in avoiding diffraction. By shooting at f/2.8, the lens operated within its optimal optical range, offering better micro-contrast and detail retention. Each focal plane in the stack preserved the maximum possible sharpness, which, when blended in post-processing, produced a crisp and well-balanced final image.
Even though wide apertures like f/2.8 reduce depth of field, focus stacking makes up for this by layering focused slices together. The benefit is not just across focal ranges but also in fine structure fidelity—details that are typically softened in an f/22 shot due to the bending of light around the aperture blades.
Post-Processing Challenges and Observations
While the result of focus stacking is undeniably sharper, the process does require effort in post. Using software like Photoshop, each image must be aligned, layered, and blended accurately. Artifacts may emerge—especially around edges where movement occurs between exposures. In my test, a few artifacts appeared where leaves had shifted slightly, and there was some fringing along the image border due to auto-alignment.
However, these imperfections were easily corrected with modest cropping and basic retouching. Overall, the blend worked smoothly, and the effort paid off with a strikingly cleaner image. This shows that even minimal practice with focus stacking can yield professional-level results.
Performance of f/22 in Practical Scenarios
The single f/22 shot wasn’t a failure by any means. It delivered adequate depth of field and was straightforward to shoot. No additional editing steps were necessary, and the shot was ready to use out of the camera with minor contrast and color adjustments. For web display or smaller prints, this image would be more than acceptable.
But compared side-by-side with the stacked version, it lacked the vibrancy and tactile sharpness that distinguishes exceptional landscape photography. Especially for high-end uses like fine art printing or portfolio presentation, the softness caused by diffraction subtly but significantly limits the image's impact.
Workflow Considerations in the Field
One of the most noticeable differences between the two methods is the field workflow. Shooting at f/22 takes seconds. Set your composition, focus approximately one-third into the scene, stop down the aperture, and click the shutter. It’s quick and efficient, especially when conditions are changing fast.
Focus stacking, on the other hand, slows everything down. You must shoot several exposures, making fine adjustments to focus each time. A steady tripod is non-negotiable, and scene movement—like wind or shifting light—can complicate blending. For this reason, focus stacking is best used when the scene is static, the light is stable, and you have time to work methodically.
Despite the added time and effort, the payoff in image quality is often worth it, particularly for images intended to be printed large or displayed in high-resolution formats.
Comparing Results in Print and Digital Output
The ultimate test for landscape imagery is not just how it looks on a monitor but how it holds up in print. I prepared both the f/22 and focus-stacked images for a 24x36 inch print. The results were illuminating.
The f/22 print looked clean but slightly dull. Fine textures—like lichen on rocks and pine needles in the distance—appeared soft, almost painterly. In contrast, the focus-stacked image displayed more texture, separation between layers, and a sense of depth that drew the eye through the image. It simply looked more lifelike, with nuanced tonal transitions and crisp detail throughout.
Digital output confirmed this as well. On a high-resolution screen, the stacked image retained its integrity even when zoomed significantly, while the f/22 image quickly showed signs of blur and resolution breakdown.
Unlocking Peak Lens Performance: The Sweet Spot in Landscape Photography
Achieving maximum image sharpness is not solely about using expensive gear or advanced editing software—it often comes down to understanding how your lens performs at different aperture settings. Every photographic lens has a “sweet spot,” an aperture range where its optical performance is at its peak. For landscape photographers chasing edge-to-edge clarity, knowing and using this range can make the difference between a good image and a truly stunning one.
While many believe that stopping down to f/22 guarantees total depth of field, the trade-off is a significant loss of image quality due to diffraction. In contrast, shooting at your lens’s sweet spot balances depth, clarity, and contrast—critical for large prints, professional portfolios, and high-resolution display.
What Is a Lens Sweet Spot and Why It Matters
A lens’s sweet spot is the aperture where it delivers optimal sharpness, typically found two to three stops down from its maximum aperture. For most high-quality wide-angle lenses, this range falls between f/8 and f/11. At these apertures, lenses tend to avoid both the softness associated with wide-open apertures and the degradation caused by diffraction at narrower settings like f/22.
This balance is essential in landscape photography where maintaining both foreground detail and distant sharpness is a constant challenge. At the sweet spot, you get better micro-contrast, minimal chromatic aberration, and improved edge definition. This translates into clearer textures, more defined shapes, and a more immersive viewing experience—whether viewed on a screen or in a large print.
Many photographers overlook this concept, often assuming that more depth of field always equals more sharpness. But in reality, excessive stopping down often compromises image fidelity. Mastering the sweet spot enables you to harness the full potential of your lens.
Diffraction: The Unseen Sharpness Killer
Diffraction is an optical phenomenon that causes light waves to spread and bend when passing through a very small aperture. This bending creates a softening effect that reduces image sharpness, particularly in fine detail areas. While a narrow aperture like f/22 may give the illusion of everything being in focus, the overall clarity suffers.
High-resolution sensors, commonly found in today’s DSLRs and mirrorless cameras, make diffraction even more apparent. As pixel density increases, the image becomes more susceptible to softness caused by diffraction. The sensor is simply resolving more detail—making any loss in quality much easier to spot.
Using the sweet spot of the lens avoids this problem. Instead of compensating for depth of field through aperture alone, landscape photographers can achieve greater clarity by combining optimal aperture settings with compositional techniques such as hyperfocal focusing or modern methods like focus stacking.
Testing and Finding the Sweet Spot of Your Lens
Every lens behaves differently, even across the same focal range or manufacturer. That’s why field testing your gear is essential. To identify your lens’s sweet spot, conduct controlled tests at multiple aperture settings—shoot the same subject, using consistent lighting, a tripod, and manual focus.
Review the images at 100% on a calibrated monitor and observe areas like edge sharpness, central resolution, and color contrast. You’ll often find that somewhere between f/8 and f/11, the image just looks cleaner, tighter, and more resolved.
With my own 16–35mm wide-angle lens, I found that f/11 consistently delivered excellent sharpness from corner to corner. Textures in rocks, details in foliage, and distant elements like mountains remained crisp without the faint softness that appears at f/22. Once you’ve identified your own lens’s sweet spot, it becomes easier to make quick aperture decisions in the field—resulting in more technically sound images.
Combining Focus Stacking with the Sweet Spot for Ultimate Sharpness
While using the sweet spot already enhances image clarity, it becomes even more powerful when paired with focus stacking. This method involves taking multiple images focused at different distances and blending them in post-processing to achieve full-scene sharpness.
By shooting each frame at the lens’s optimal aperture, you maintain the highest level of detail possible at every focal plane. Foreground elements like stones, mid-ground subjects like trees, and background details such as skies or mountains all retain their sharpness, producing a final image that looks lifelike and immersive.
The synergy between shooting at the sweet spot and using focus stacking creates files that are print-ready, highly detailed, and free from the visual compromises of single-shot, narrow-aperture captures. It offers professional-level sharpness control and opens creative possibilities for compositions that require extreme depth clarity.
When to Use the Sweet Spot Without Focus Stacking
While focus stacking produces exceptional results, it may not always be practical—particularly in dynamic environments. If the wind is blowing through grass or trees, or if lighting conditions are changing rapidly, multiple exposures can introduce blending issues. In these cases, relying on a single exposure becomes necessary.
This is where knowing your lens’s sweet spot becomes invaluable. Instead of defaulting to f/22 and risking diffraction softness, you can shoot at f/8 or f/11 and focus near the hyperfocal distance. This ensures the majority of the scene is in focus without compromising clarity.
Even without stacking, using the sweet spot enables you to capture rich, well-defined images that are sharper than their f/22 counterparts. It’s a subtle but powerful shift that elevates the technical quality of your photography.
Understanding the Right Time to Use Focus Stacking in Landscape Photography
Focus stacking is one of the most powerful techniques in the toolkit of modern landscape photographers, allowing for breathtaking levels of clarity and detail. However, its effectiveness hinges on timing, conditions, and the nature of the subject being captured. While the results can be visually extraordinary, it’s not always the most suitable method for every scene. There are times when using this technique is highly advantageous—and others when it may become impractical or even counterproductive.
Knowing when to implement focus stacking is just as important as knowing how to do it. The ability to assess environmental factors, light stability, and subject movement can make or break the success of a stacked composition. In this expanded discussion, we’ll explore the best scenarios for using focus stacking, and just as importantly, when to avoid it.
Ideal Conditions for Focus Stacking in Outdoor Photography
The most successful focus-stacked images are created in static, controlled conditions. For this reason, photographers tend to rely on the method during calm, windless days or early mornings when the environment is most stable. When there’s minimal movement in vegetation, water, or clouds, the multiple exposures required for focus stacking blend seamlessly. This ensures consistency between frames and avoids post-processing errors.
Scenes like forest interiors, rocky seascapes, desert landscapes, mountain valleys, and architectural subjects lend themselves well to stacking. These subjects typically feature complex compositions with elements at varying distances—making it nearly impossible to capture all details in one exposure while preserving optimal sharpness.
In such cases, focus stacking allows the photographer to use an aperture like f/8 or f/11, the lens’s sharpest zone, and build a composition that’s tack-sharp from foreground pebbles to distant ridgelines. These are the moments where the method truly shines, producing a level of image fidelity that simply can’t be matched using small apertures alone.
Scenes to Avoid: Movement and Unpredictability
While focus stacking offers exceptional control over depth of field, it demands time and absolute consistency. This becomes a major challenge in dynamic scenes. Sunset colors change quickly, shadows move dramatically during golden hour, and skies with drifting clouds evolve by the second. Attempting to shoot and align multiple exposures in such scenarios often leads to mismatched elements, ghosting, or failed composites.
Wind introduces another major obstacle. Even the most delicate leaf or blade of grass can ruin a focus-stacked sequence if it moves between frames. While some post-processing techniques can reduce the visual impact of such discrepancies, they rarely match the natural look and polish of a single, well-executed frame.
In these cases, it’s often better to rely on traditional depth-of-field control. Using a smaller aperture—accepting some diffraction-induced softness—is often a better compromise than risking a flawed stack. Flexibility and speed are vital when light or motion won’t wait.
Tripod Use and Setup Precision: The Foundation of Successful Stacking
A solid tripod is a non-negotiable tool when it comes to focus stacking in the field. Camera movement between exposures can introduce misalignment, making it harder to blend images cleanly. Using remote triggers, mirror lock-up, and ensuring your tripod is on a stable surface further improves your chances of capturing clean, consistent frames.
Equally important is maintaining identical exposure settings across each shot. Any variation in ISO, shutter speed, or aperture will introduce inconsistencies that can degrade the final blend. Manual focus adjustments should be done in small, careful increments, ensuring seamless overlap between each plane of focus. This workflow may take time, but the reward is exceptional detail and consistency.
Using tools such as focus rails or programmable focus bracketing features in modern cameras can make this process even more precise. While these accessories aren’t essential, they offer added control and eliminate guesswork during fieldwork.
Creative Freedom Through Controlled Focus Depth
What sets focus stacking apart from traditional depth-of-field techniques is the creative freedom it offers. Instead of being limited to one focal point per exposure, you can design your image with precision. You decide exactly where sharpness begins and ends. This control is invaluable when composing scenes with intricate elements in both the foreground and background.
Imagine photographing a winding trail with flowers in the foreground and jagged peaks in the distance. With a single shot, you’d have to compromise—either the flowers or the mountains would be soft. Focus stacking removes that restriction. It allows you to fully honor the scene’s visual depth without optical sacrifice.
The ability to design focus zones during post-processing also gives you more artistic input after the shutter is pressed. You can enhance or reduce depth, create custom bokeh transitions, or ensure that the viewer’s eye travels seamlessly through the entire frame. This level of control transforms the process from simple image capture to genuine visual design.
Focus Stacking for Large Prints and Commercial Projects
The benefits of focus stacking become even more pronounced when images are intended for large-scale viewing. Whether producing gallery prints, exhibition panels, or high-resolution advertising visuals, every pixel of detail counts. Viewers will notice softness, especially in foreground elements, which are typically closest to the eye in a printed image.
For professional photographers, this precision becomes essential. Clients expect clean files, and editorial or commercial prints require maximum clarity throughout. In this context, the extra time and care invested in focus stacking are well justified. It can elevate the visual sophistication of your work and set it apart in competitive markets.
By leveraging your lens's optimal aperture range and building focus across the scene, you generate images that are both technically refined and visually engaging. In many cases, focus stacking is the only technique capable of delivering this level of output, especially for complex or layered scenes.
Balance, Patience, and Purpose: Knowing When to Stack
The true art of using focus stacking lies in choosing your moments wisely. It’s not a universal solution but rather a targeted technique. Recognizing when it adds value—and when it might cause more problems than it solves—is what separates an efficient photographer from an experimental one.
Ask yourself: is the scene calm enough to allow multiple exposures? Is the light stable for long enough to shoot and stack properly? Are there moving elements that could disrupt the blend? Will the final use of the image—social media, small prints, or large-format display—warrant the added sharpness that focus stacking provides?
If the answers favor a static, stable scene and a high-resolution final output, then focus stacking is likely the right choice. If the moment is fleeting or the subject in motion, choosing a single, well-focused frame at a moderate aperture may serve you better.
Pros of Using Focus Stacking for Landscapes
One of the biggest advantages of focus stacking is the ability to maintain high image sharpness while using more optically efficient apertures like f/5.6, f/8, or f/11. Here are a few benefits worth considering:
-
Enables faster shutter speeds, especially useful in low light
-
Reduces or eliminates diffraction-related softening
-
Offers full creative control over focus depth during editing
-
Maximizes resolution in both digital and print formats
-
Retains optimal lens performance without sacrificing depth of field
Moreover, focus stacking allows you to create images that look almost hyper-real, especially when printed large. Fine textures in foreground elements like moss, gravel, or leaf detail can appear almost three-dimensional when processed correctly.
Cons and Challenges of Focus Stacking
Despite its advantages, focus stacking comes with challenges. It’s not a quick process and requires a thoughtful workflow both during the shoot and in post-processing. Here are a few drawbacks:
-
Time-intensive: capturing multiple exposures requires patience
-
Susceptible to movement: wind-blown elements like grass or leaves may cause blending issues
-
Requires precise focus adjustments and tripod use
-
Photoshop or stacking software may introduce alignment artifacts
-
Post-processing complexity may deter those unfamiliar with editing tools
You’ll also need to crop your final image slightly to eliminate edges misaligned during layer stacking. This can reduce the overall field of view, so planning your composition with extra room is a good idea.
How to Perform Focus Stacking in Photoshop
If you’re ready to dive into the technique, here’s a quick step-by-step outline on how to stack your images using Photoshop:
-
Capture 3–5 images at different focal points using a tripod
-
Open all the images in Photoshop
-
Go to File > Scripts > Load Files into Stack
-
Select all your images and check the box that says "Attempt to Automatically Align Source Images"
-
Once stacked, select all layers and go to Edit > Auto-Blend Layers
-
Choose “Stack Images” and check “Seamless Tones and Colors”
-
Photoshop will create a composite with blended sharp areas from each image
-
Flatten the image and crop any distorted edges
With practice, this process becomes intuitive and can be done relatively quickly for static compositions. For more intricate adjustments, you can use layer masks to manually control which areas from each photo remain visible.
When to Choose f/22 Instead of Focus Stacking
There are moments when using f/22 still makes sense. In dynamic lighting situations—like golden hour light changing by the second—focus stacking may not be feasible. If you’re shooting handheld, trying to avoid movement, or don’t have time for post-processing, stopping down your lens is a quicker solution. However, remember that image quality will be slightly compromised due to diffraction, especially on higher-resolution sensors.
Real-World Applications and Final Thoughts
Focus stacking is an invaluable tool for landscape photographers looking to elevate their work—particularly for large prints, exhibitions, or portfolios where every pixel counts. It allows you to push the boundaries of what's possible with in-camera focus and provides post-capture flexibility that traditional methods simply can’t offer.
On the flip side, it’s not ideal for fast-paced scenarios. For quick, documentary-style landscapes, travel shots, or spontaneous conditions, classic narrow-aperture shooting still has its place.
Ultimately, combining both techniques in your workflow will make you a more versatile and effective photographer. Use focus stacking when you want complete creative control, and fall back on f/22 when time or conditions demand simplicity.
Final Thoughts:
As landscape photographers, we constantly chase the elusive perfect shot—one where every rock, tree, and cloud is rendered with crisp clarity. Achieving full-scene sharpness is both a technical and creative challenge, and the tools we choose to accomplish it can dramatically impact the final result. Focus stacking and traditional narrow-aperture shooting each offer valid solutions, but they serve different purposes depending on the scene, intent, and desired output.
Using an aperture like f/22 has long been the default method for maximizing depth of field. It’s quick, effective, and works well when speed is of the essence. If you're capturing fleeting light, changing weather, or fast-moving subjects like waves or wildlife, the simplicity of a single shot at f/22 is a significant advantage. However, this comes at the cost of image sharpness due to diffraction, especially noticeable in high-resolution images or large-format prints.
Focus stacking, on the other hand, offers unmatched sharpness across the entire frame without the optical trade-offs of a narrow aperture. It allows you to use your lens at its sharpest aperture—typically between f/8 and f/11—while achieving perfect clarity from foreground to background. This method does require more planning, time, and post-processing, but for scenes that are static and worth the effort, the results can be stunningly detailed and visually immersive.
For photographers serious about print quality, fine art landscapes, or creating work for commercial or editorial use, focus stacking is a technique worth mastering. It gives you the flexibility to control depth of field in ways that a single exposure simply cannot. However, it’s important to recognize that not every shot needs it. Being able to assess your scene and decide whether a stacked image or a traditional f/22 shot is more appropriate will ultimately elevate your skills and results.
The best landscape photographers are not loyal to one method—they’re fluent in both. Know your tools, understand their strengths and weaknesses, and choose the right technique for each situation. That’s how you consistently produce sharp, compelling, and professional-quality imagery in any condition.
